ANJALI DALAL-WHELAN / NEWS EDITOR
Some USD students are hoping to receive restitution for the potentially dangerous conditions they experienced in an off-campus apartment building. As students begin to sign leases for next school year’s housing, a civil complaint filed by the San Diego City Attorney is still pending against the carl on Lauretta, a USD-alumni owned, off-campus apartment building that mainly houses students.
Residents of the carl on Lauretta have faced a variety of challenges with their housing over the 2023-24 academic year. On Nov. 9 The USD Vista published an article reporting on issues that students had faced while living in the carl on Lauretta.
These challenges included a delayed move in and non functional elevators. Residents received notices to vacate from the City of San Diego in the fall, but were told to ignore them by building management. After the notices stopped being zip-tied to residents’ doors, they thought the situation had been resolved, however, the controversy around the building was only beginning.
On Dec. 4, The San Diego City Attorney’s Office filed a civil enforcement complaint against the owners of the carl on Lauretta, alleging that the owners violated San Diego Municipal Code and California Business and Professions Code, by allegedly issuing leases without the required certificate of occupancy. The complaint listed the owners as, “The Mogaford Capital Group LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, doing business as Crawford Design & Development; Michael Crawford, an individual; HUGS International corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Carl-Olivier Dumesle, an individual.”
Both individuals listed in the complaint, Michael Crawford and Carl-Olivier Dumesle are USD alumni.
In an interview with NBC 7, San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliot provided details on the complaint.
According to Elliot, the developers did not obtain the proper permits before they began building the carl on Lauretta.
“Before you take major steps to demolish that single-family dwelling, the owner needed to come to the city to get a demolition permit. They didn’t do that,” Elliot told NBC.
One of the major issues brought up by Elliot was that the fire alarms were not operational for some of the time residents lived in the carl on Lauretta.
“Code enforcement, the fire department went out dozens of times to that property to let them know, ‘hey, we looked at your systems and they are not in compliance,’” Elliot said.
USD senior and the carl on Lauretta resident Olivia Wiley learned that the fire alarms were not operational for part of the time she lived in the building from the news reports. She described her reaction to seeing the news.
“We knew that they were having trouble with [the fire alarms], but we didn’t know the extent of the trouble,” Wiley said. “I just was kind of stressed about not having working fire alarms to be honest. If I had a fire then what are we going to do? Like in the middle of the night, just not wake up? It was kind of scary.”
Wiley explained what has changed at the carl on Lauretta, since the civil enforcement complaint was filed.
“We got new management last month. The old management company I think was fired by the owner.” Wiley said. “They [the new management company] have been more responsive to emails and stuff.”
Wiley explained that the new management had been responsive to issues such as fixing a broken lock and replacing the fire alarm batteries. However, the elevators are still not operational.
According to the City of San Diego Development Services Department, the carl on Lauretta still has two uncompleted inspections. The city’s website states that “not all final inspections are completed and passed.”
Andrew Sharp, the Director of Strategic Communications for the office of the City Attorney provided an update on the civil complaint on March 4.
“The property is still in violation of the San Diego Municipal Code and California Business and Professions Code sections 17200 through 17210,” Sharp stated. “We have requested injunctive relief, civil penalties, and restitution for impacted residents.” Injunctive relief restrains parties from acting in certain ways, civil penalties are fines payed to the government.
Wiley says she thinks she should receive restitution or recompensation.
“I think that for the amenities like the elevator, I think there should be some sort of back pay,” Wiley said.
“Especially because I live on the fourth floor, so I have to walk up the stairs every day, lug my groceries up there, moving in was not fun.”
USD senior Elle Kallsen, another resident of the carl on Lauretta, explained she had considered the idea of asking for restitution for her experiences living in the building.
“I intend to look through my lease and see what I signed and reflect on what was accurate and what was not accurate during my time at the carl” Kallsen said.
The USD Vista contacted Michael Crawford by email and messaged and called Carl-Olivier Dumesle but did not receive a response from either.
The building’s owners have not responded to requests for comment.
As reported by The USD Vista, USD entered a partnership with the carl and associated properties last summer due to a lack of on-campus housing. USD discovered issues with the housing and moved students leased through USD out of the affiliated buildings last fall.
USD Director of Media Relations Lissette Martinez provided an update on USD’s partnership with the carl on behalf of USD.
“The University of San Diego terminated its relationship with the Carl. USD is not currently partnering with Carl or its holding company, the Mogaford Capital Group, and there are no plans to do so in the future,” Martinez stated.
Many residents of the carl on Lauretta will be moving out when their leases end in June, but according to City Attorney Mara Elliot, the civil enforcement complaint could take months or years to be resolved.
The carl on Lauretta’ was newly developed in 2023, but has run into issues in its first year. Lili Kim/The USD Vista
Leave a comment